RailsConf 2007

0 comments

They opened up registration today for RailsConf 2007. It's happening May 17-20 in Portland, Oregon. Adam, Shawn and I are registered and raring to go. Looking at the sessions planned for this year's conference, it looks to be very interesting and informative. Can't wait.

Tagged: rails, railsconf

OS X Leopard to have Ruby on Rails

0 comments

I received a jubilant email today from Shawn that contained a link to this article officially announcing that Mac OS X Leopard will indeed be shipped with Ruby on Rails pre-configured.

For anyone who's followed these great directions to get RoR up and running on a Mac knows that it takes a fair amount of time and a good bit of focus to get everything correct. Having everything pre-installed will save many people a great deal of aggravation.

On top of having Ruby and Rails in the box, they've promised other packaged goodies like Mongrel, a Ruby alternative to Apache that I've heard is much more efficient.

It's not like I needed another reason to look forward to the OS X update, but now I'm truly excited to get my hands on Leopard.

Tagged: apple, rails

Why Ruby on Rails is better than .NET

2 comments

For the past four days at work I've been assigned to apply a redesign to an older .NET site that we did a couple of years ago. It has been infuriatingly frustrating trying to apply a CSS-based design to a table-based .NET site. The way .NET handles almost everything is so convoluted and esoteric that it took me a full day just to get the hang of how it handled displaying markup.

And what is the deal with the datagrid?!?! It's great on paper, but crap in practice. Just the datagrid definition spanned five lines. Using the AlternatingItemStyle tag to get alternating styles for the table rows is ok, but Rails makes it SOOOO much easier with the cycle method. And speaking of styles, the datagrid has to have each style that you'd like applied declared seperately which makes for the huge datagrid definition. Also, take a look at the HTML that a datagrid produces. You'll be surprised at how much markup it can create for a simple <td>.

Now, don't get me wrong. I can see where .NET would be useful and I'm sure there are a ton of examples where it would make much more sense to use .NET than Rails. I think my biggest problem is that I know almost nothing about .NET. I can get by with making visual changes, but I stay far away from the codebehinds.

Closing thoughts: give Ruby on Rails a try! You might just like it!

Tagged: rails

Syndicated!

0 comments

One of the things I had hoped to be able to do with Rails for this blog was to create an RSS feed. I briefly looked at the chapter that describes how to do this in the Rails Recipes book and kinda decided put it off until later.

Well, after seeing that Adam added an RSS feed to his blog and even provided the steps he took to accomplish it, I decided to finally implement it. It turned out to be a lot easier than I thought.

So, if you're really bored often, go ahead and subscribe.

Tagged: rails, rss

Ruby on Rails having problems with table column names

1 comment

I was working on a project for work today that invloved the client be able to enter customer testimonials into a database to be displayed randomly on each site page. I named the table quotes and it had three columns: id, person, and quote. I made id an integer and quote and person were both varchars. Everything worked fine with this configuration.

After some testing, I discovered that a varchar wasn't the best type for the quote because it didn't have enough room for the longer testimonials. Like a good Rails developer, I wrote a migration script to change the quote column to be text instead of varchar. Well, after making this change, Rails bombed every time I tried to add another quote. For some reason, it didn't like the column to be of type text and have the same name as the Rails table object. I'm not exactly sure what or why specifically caused this problem, but it definitely didn't work. After some consultation with The Shawnami, the resident Rails guru, and some extensive frustration, we finally decided to try and just rename the column. Guess what? It worked perfectly after I renamed it content.

Tagged: rails, db